They’re auto complete machines. All they fundamentally do is match words together. If it was trained on the answers and still couldn’t reproduce the correct word matches, it failed.
Every person who took that test was trained on the answers. Or at least they should have been, I’m sure some neglected their studies as I was guilty of myself. Are they all failures too?
No. You are all over this entire post showing everyone how stupid you want to look. You have no understanding of what you’re talking about, and apparently the thought process of a sixth grader.
You haven’t provided any details whatsoever even once, and have instead just ask stupid inane questions as if they have any substance at all.
I answered your last question to me. Think about it and hopefully you’ll figure it out. Have a good one.
They aren’t auto complete machines, they are neural networks. Why are you trying to explain it when you clearly don’t have the first idea of how things work?
the very funny thing is, all of the garden variety free text autocomplete systems I’ve worked with have been implemented using neural nets. it’s not like it’s a particularly new or novel approach. but surely the AI bros coming into this thread know that and they’re not just regurgitating buzzwords, right?
I feel like this exposes a fundamental misunderstanding of how LLMs are trained.
They’re auto complete machines. All they fundamentally do is match words together. If it was trained on the answers and still couldn’t reproduce the correct word matches, it failed.
Every person who took that test was trained on the answers. Or at least they should have been, I’m sure some neglected their studies as I was guilty of myself. Are they all failures too?
People are not machines.
Understood and agreed. What does this have to do with the point?
If you’re unable to follow the conversation I’m out of here.
Don’t blame me for your inability to make a point.
No. You are all over this entire post showing everyone how stupid you want to look. You have no understanding of what you’re talking about, and apparently the thought process of a sixth grader.
You haven’t provided any details whatsoever even once, and have instead just ask stupid inane questions as if they have any substance at all.
I answered your last question to me. Think about it and hopefully you’ll figure it out. Have a good one.
Again, trying to make it my fault you can’t make your point, just more angry this time because you were called out.
People are machines
You have the energy to spread misinformation and spam downvotes, how about an intelligent response instead?
How about I ban you for being obnoxious instead?
I like them rules you got here
“don’t come into our loungeroom and piss on the floor” should be simple and obvious, and yet
@dgerard @TachyonTele that rug really tied the room together, man
how about fuck off
They aren’t auto complete machines, they are neural networks. Why are you trying to explain it when you clearly don’t have the first idea of how things work?
the very funny thing is, all of the garden variety free text autocomplete systems I’ve worked with have been implemented using neural nets. it’s not like it’s a particularly new or novel approach. but surely the AI bros coming into this thread know that and they’re not just regurgitating buzzwords, right?
Don’t worry friend, you are correct.
Edit: Lets see some intelligent responses rather than downvotes. Bunch off teens majoring in “AI”.
How did you get 3 downvotes so fast on this day old post?