• simple
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re refering to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux-

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s the problem, though: a lot of it isn’t GNU, specifically because GNU stuff is GPLv3 and would thus stop the smart TV and IoT device makers from Tivoizing everything all to Hell. Most of that stuff is running bastardized Linux, not GNU/Linux!

    • silkroadtraveler@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      A name is just a simple reference to a system composed of interrelated and essential OS components: Kernel, windowing system, networking tools, virtual memory, user interfaces, the list goes on…

      Yes GNU is an essential suite of tools but so is X (or Wayland) and many other unnamed yet critical subsystems.

      Now GPL licensing on the other hand, THAT is a foundational precept to FOSS that deserves sole credit back to a single project.

    • desconectado
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Do you correct everyone who says Windows instead of Microsoft Windows NT?

      • JATth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        The NT kernel in isolation is apparently quite “ok”, from what i have heard of it. It’s the spyware, malware, driver crap (“windows”) running on/using it which is unquestionably totally fucked and disgusting. If they were to FOSS the NT kernel, I could maybe support an such endeavor.