• betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Figured the fraud mentioned in the wiki article covered the “dishonest” part and “wrong” was easier to prove. I can’t rule out the possibility that he’s in so deep that he really believes what he’s saying (not that it’d make the situation any better).

          Sucks to hear that you’ve had bad reactions in the past but I’m glad it didn’t turn you against them as a whole. Hopefully enough of the rest of us can get them and lower the overall risk of illness when flu season rolls around.

            • Asafum@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’m actually the same way, I’m one of those that got myocarditis after the vaccine, but I also understand that nothing is side affect free so while it stinks for me I still 100% support the use of vaccines… Thankfully after a few weeks/months the heart palpitations stopped.

              I mean … Polio anyone? No? Chickenpox? Oh yeah that’s right, vaccines. They actually worked.

                • Piers@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Chickenpox. Ahem. We didn’t have a vaccine for that when I was a child. We just caught it and were miserable for a few weeks.

                  I’m sorry to tell you that’s not what happened.

                  You had chickenpox for a few weeks whilst the shingles bedded down nice and cosy in your nerves ready to strike again when your immune system is down. It’s not over and it’ll be worse when it comes back.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          IIRC, he wasn’t even anti vax at the start. He was being paid to peddle separate vaccines and claimed it was just the MMR jab that could cause autism.

          Which is still bollocks anyway, but people will do anything to deny that autism runs in their family…

          • Jaccident
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            He wasn’t just paid to peddle the separate vaccines. He owned the company that made them.

      • moitoi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And if only, it was just him in the autism field. SBC isn’t better than him on the piece of shit scale.

        • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s a whole industry of quacks exploiting families desperate for answers and solutions when they feel out of their depth with a child they don’t fully understand. Makes me sick.

    • chulo_sinhatche@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love when people claim to not trust the science of vaccines. Vaccines created using the same scientific method that allowed the invention of the smart phones they’re typing from. The same science that allows for all modern medicine, energy production, manuacturing, etc.

      • jcit878@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        most cookers don’t understand what the scientific method is. my brother thinks it’s like some list of formulas scientists use to see if something is true or not, not the entire actual process around theory/observation/evidence/peer review. they thibk “science” indoctrinates people to think a certain way and that scientists somehow are told to ignore everything not in a textbook. no explaining how wrong this is in over 3 years has helped

      • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, the scientific method produces mistakes - it’s just that the scientific method is also intended to fix those mistakes over time. Being critical of research is helpful for the correct functioning of the scientific method, but this has nothing to do with conspiracy theorists who will question the overwhelmingly corroborated general principles that determine the functioning of AC or light bulbs.

    • Bendavisunlv6@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think you’re missing that she is a pediatrician and not just a “doctor.” Pediatricians administer a big majority of vaccines and care for the patients receiving them. They probably do learn a hell of a lot more about them than, say, an oncologist who spends all their time treating cancer in old people. And they see the effects of them up close in the field. Any doctor is constantly researching and staying up to date. A pediatrician worth their salt is very well educated on all relevant studies even if they didn’t conduct those studies with their own two hands. I reject the notion that you need to conduct the studies to know the science: that’s a ludicrous bar for us to set.

      • Eheran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        35
        ·
        1 year ago

        The point is that her education or anecdotal evidence is not relevant to begin with.

          • Eheran@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            How is that not the point he made?

            How is it not accurate? Someone’s titles or anecdotal evidence are irrelevant when statistics about millions of individuals are the only tool to reveal such tiny issues. If one doctor would already notice issues with something, then the whole massive chain that led to the human use of that medicine completely failed in an unprecedented way - after all, even the most basic tests should have immediately revealed problems.

            • Bendavisunlv6@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              A doctor has access to totally different electronic information services than the average jackass on Facebook, if you didn’t know. Lawyers and journalists have their own versions of this too. So yeah, any doctor has better info than any private individual.

              More importantly, they have well-informed judgment about how to consume those statistics, quality them, and apply them. This is quite important as the average Facebook jackass is bombarded by deliberately misleading information which they need to think critically about unraveling.

              • Eheran@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                How does a doctor have different access to papers with statistical analysis regarding such topics?

                Does a lawyer have different laws than those I can look at?

                Better judgement, yes, valid point.

                • hamtooth
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Have you tried to read a primary resource, scientific article? They are mostly behind a paywall, hospitals and universities pay for subscription access. So yes, doctors and researchers have easier access to papers than the public (and the expertise to critically evaluate the information presented). Also, those large cohort studies with thorough stats are a huge amount of work and always have a team of people to design the experiments, interact with patients, get the data, run the stats, and so forth. MDs would be in the mix there too, it’s not like a single immunologist would do the whole thing alone…

                  • Eheran@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    That is your argument? Paywall? And now it is just easier access, not actually some kind of different material all together as you claimed? There are things like Scihub, let alone any student in any university has essentially access to all papers anyway? How is that in any way anything special?

                    I also don’t get why you bring me into the discussion. Keep it about the topic at hand, you know nothing about me. It is irrelevant whether I read papers or not.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      In even more fairness, reading memes on Facebook makes you even less of an expert on vaccines.

        • samus12345@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nowhere did the woman in the image claim to be an “expert,” though, so why bring it up? Everyone giving advice about something doesn’t have to be an expert.

    • GBU_28
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Perhaps agree she’s not an “expert” but she’s certainly “educated”

    • Rossel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You can get into a research career as an MD too. It’s not strictly clinical practice.

      We’re all encouraged to publish papers.

    • Moobythegoldensock
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Med school is definitely not a trade school. The amount of material I learned per day in med school was about the same quantity as a week of college.

    • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      First of all, fuck you. Nowhere did anyone say she was an expert. Like let me just pick up this goal post and move it.

      Second of all fuck you. You don’t need to be an expert know the experts opinion.

      Did I mention, fuck you?