• XIN
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The idea is that the light is small and close. It doesn’t need to go over the horizon to disappear in the distance.

    I’m not sure how they explain the random pattern the light would need to travel for different seasons or why it looks so massive as it rises or sets.

    • green_pyroxene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      “it doesn’t need to go over the horizon to disappear in the distance”, but the problem is that it does go over the horizon rather than disappearing, as anyone who’s seen a sunset can attest

        • XIN
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well that’s your problem right there: you’re using logic.

      • XIN
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe not truly logical, but there is definitely an attempt at logic as well as experiments.

        The documentary Beyond the Globe was kinda funny, sad and interesting all at once.

    • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      so most visible stars are about 1000 light years away. And they’re still visible. And our sun obviously cannot travel at least over 1000 light years twice a day.

      • XIN
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        For reference a light year is about 63241 times further than the distance between the earth and sun.