• Prandom_returns
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago
    1. The state
    2. The state.
    3. Not for free, but the state.

    Just like social housing. But for everyne.

    If you want to own a home, buy it from the state.

    If you can’t afford it, rent it from the state.

    If you want to buy it, but can’t afford it, do the bank thing, but with the state.

    • Cleverdawny
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, uh huh, okay. So go do that if you really think you can come up with public housing that isn’t a fucking nightmare. And if you think you can get it passed. Until then, the rest of us have to live in the real world.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, uh huh, okay. So go do that if you really think you can come up with public housing that isn’t a fucking nightmare.

        The FHA is already involved with lots of real estate transactions. The VA already provides some of the best loans in the country to military personnel. Just because you cannot envision the state being involved in housing without it turning into housing testaments from USSR doesn’t mean it’s not possible.

        • Cleverdawny
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yep, and the great thing is that people have other choices, too. I’ve got no problem with FHA, VA, USDA loans.

      • Prandom_returns
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not public housing, you did not understand what I wrote.

        • Cleverdawny
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          You want the state to have a monopoly on rental housing and the sale of houses. That’s what I read.

          • Prandom_returns
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s correct. How is this “social housing nightmare”? Instead of the bank owning your house, the state will.

            • Cleverdawny
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sounds awful. I don’t want ownership of my house to be exposed to malicious politicians and underfunded, incompetent bureaucrats following Byzantine regulations.

              • Prandom_returns
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Lmao, yeah… Now you get all that AND you’re paying for it. Good luck.

                • Cleverdawny
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Not really. We are in a best of both worlds situation here, with government credit backing competitive private loans.

                  • Prandom_returns
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Capitalism fanboys are the worst… You’re either a landlord, a boomer or deranged.

                    “Best of both worlds”. While housing crisis destroying lives of young people around the world. How fucking dare you.