This is such a gross oversimplification of the actual events that it tells us nothing.
More frustrating when seeing people weigh in on the issue who clearly lack even a fundamental understanding of the political landscape and history in Sweden.
You’re know you’re allowed to say why you think those things instead of just doing a generic ad hominem attack contributing nothing to the discussion nor countering anything that was said?
At least you folded and now realize what you originally did was try to counter their argument with a nicer sounding, more verbose version of “you’re stupid.” Take the L and move on.
Are you fucking with me?.. ok, again; my counterargument was that it’s such an oversimplification of the issue that it tells us nothing. It’s not a personal attack or an insult.
How in the everloving fuck can it be that hard to grasp the concept of debating and argumentation?!
Okej, den kan jag faktiskt dels ge dig. Jag tänkte inte riktigt när jag postade, och ja, det är frustrerande när utlänningar fundamentalt missförstår svensk politik. Men jag tycker fortfarande att det är en något fungerande förenkling för utlänningar.
Det är helt missvisande eftersom den här personen verkar tycka att vågmästare tydligen menar sammarbete när sd fyllde samma roll under den socialdemokratiska regeringen
This is such a gross oversimplification of the actual events that it tells us nothing.
More frustrating when seeing people weigh in on the issue who clearly lack even a fundamental understanding of the political landscape and history in Sweden.
You’re know you’re allowed to say why you think those things instead of just doing a generic ad hominem attack contributing nothing to the discussion nor countering anything that was said?
I said that the statement in the post is meaningless since it grossly oversimplifies a complex issue. That is my whole point.
And it’s not an attack (against whom even?!) it’s simply a statement of an opinion.
It’s not just an opinion. It’s trying to counter or negate what they said. You directed your (attack on an) argument to either OP or the Twitter user.
It’s an opinion, I express my opinion with arguments to counter the opponents opinion and arguments, and that’s how debating works, you moron.
See, now that, on the other hand, was an attack and a statement of fact.
At least you folded and now realize what you originally did was try to counter their argument with a nicer sounding, more verbose version of “you’re stupid.” Take the L and move on.
Are you fucking with me?.. ok, again; my counterargument was that it’s such an oversimplification of the issue that it tells us nothing. It’s not a personal attack or an insult.
How in the everloving fuck can it be that hard to grasp the concept of debating and argumentation?!
Okej, den kan jag faktiskt dels ge dig. Jag tänkte inte riktigt när jag postade, och ja, det är frustrerande när utlänningar fundamentalt missförstår svensk politik. Men jag tycker fortfarande att det är en något fungerande förenkling för utlänningar.
Det är helt missvisande eftersom den här personen verkar tycka att vågmästare tydligen menar sammarbete när sd fyllde samma roll under den socialdemokratiska regeringen