I’ve been considering paying for a European provider, mounting their service with rclone, and thus being transparent to most anything I host.

How do y’all backup your data?

  • redballooon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Same, although aws is my plan b. For plan a I have an older Synology that is a full backup target.

    • grayman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      On site? I put enterprise drives in my nas. Always have and have never had a drive fail. If one does, raid is good until the replacement arrives.

      • redballooon
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Raid is no backup. Raid helps you against drive failure.

        Backup helps you if you or some script screwed up your data, or you need to go back to last months version of a file for whatever other reason.

        Aws helps if your house burns down and you need to set up again from scratch.

        • grayman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Versioning is a feature completely separate from raid or dual nas or whatever else you do. Your example of the house burning down is exactly why I questioned the dual nas… Both nas will be toast.

          So please, tell me again why you need 2 nas for versioning? Maybe you’re doing some goofy hack, then ok. That’s still silly. Just do proper versioning. If you’re coding, just use git. Don’t reinvent the wheel.

          • redballooon
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m stunned that you are unfamiliar with the versioning feature of backups. In my bubble this has been best practice since Apple came along with the Time Machine, but really we tried that even before with rsync, albeit only with limited success.

            This is different from git because this takes care about all files and configurations, and it does so automatically. Furthermore it also includes rules when to thin out and discard old versions, because space remains an issue.

            Synologys backup tool is quite similar to Time Machine, and that’s what I am using the second NAS for. I used to have a USB hard drive for that task, but it crashed and my old Synology and a few old disks were available. That’s better because it also protects against a number of attacks that make all mounted paths unusable.

            Git is not a backup tool. It’s a versioning tool, best used for text files.

            • grayman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Your condescension is matched only by your reading comprehension. I do not know what your requirements are. You said coding and alluded versioning, so I tossed out git. Enjoy your tech debt. I hope it serves you well and supports your ego for many years.

              • redballooon
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Your condescension is matched only by your reading comprehension.

                Bruh. Look into a mirror.