• @some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    296 months ago

    It’s why toys and sugary cereals run alongside cartoons. We should just ban advertising toward children.

    • @LWD
      link
      English
      18
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • @MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        216 months ago

        Seriously, I’d rather just ban overt advertisement. Labels on buildings and stylings? Sure, what ever, peacock your actual location all you want. Have tons of info and material available for people? Definitely. Have catalogs for people to look through where you layout your stuff and make it look nice? Sure. Search engines? Duh. But straight up ads? Nah. Such a waste of time. Let peoples’ interest drive the views again.

        • @LWD
          link
          English
          13
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • @wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            The most basic argument for ads that I’ve heard is that they can inform consumers of options they would not otherwise be aware of. Not unreasonable, competition can only exist if people are aware that alternatives exist.

            But that’s not how ads are used or the psychology and research put behind them. And the modern incarnation of capitalism as infintiely growing profits above literally all else puts too much skin in the game for companies to make “purely informative” ads. Ugh. Fuck ads.

    • TurtlePower
      link
      English
      16 months ago

      We should ban advertising altogether, but there’s also the wonderful method of teaching your kids the word “no”.