Veterans resign as force established as civilian disaster relief becomes ‘militaristic’ and ‘abusive’

State guards are used by many states. Since the national guard can be federalized, states need a force to protect the states while the guard is gone.

Most people don’t even know about the state defense forces

  • NeuromancerOPM
    35·
    9 months ago

    You sound so silly when you say bootlicking. lol.

    The rest is just word vomit.

    So can you cite your claim or not?

    • IHadTwoCows
      43·
      9 months ago

      Oh, and I forgot the best one: giving tax breaks will create jobs 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

      The rest isnt word vomit; it’s a literal list of conservative viewpoints of the past 50 years.

      • NeuromancerOPM
        36·
        9 months ago

        You said conservatives are mentally ill. Let’s see the cite for that. I have never seen a study that says that.

        • IHadTwoCows
          31·
          9 months ago

          Can you cite your claim that it is much more well known that liberals are mentally ill?

          • NeuromancerOPM
            16·
            9 months ago

            You need to cite your claim first before I cite common knowledge

            • IHadTwoCows
              21·
              9 months ago

              I did cite it. All you did was parrot an old Michael Savage quote, which doesn’t qualify as “common knowledge”.

              That will be enough sea lioning from you.

                • IHadTwoCows
                  31·
                  9 months ago

                  😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂jesus h christ you people are the most easily manipulated bunch of cucks ever.

                  You cant even read your own “article” 😂😂😂🤣🤣😂😂

                  • Lookin4GoodArgs
                    1·
                    9 months ago

                    Warning for violation of rule #1

                    Honestly, your arguments can probably stand on their own without calling people names.

                  • NeuromancerOPM
                    13·
                    9 months ago

                    I read the article. What do you think was incorrect?

                • IHadTwoCows
                  21·
                  9 months ago

                  Here are the facts. A meta-analysis culled from 88 samples in 12 countries, and with an N of 22,818, revealed that “several psychological variables predicted political conservatism.” Which variables exactly? In order of predictive power: death anxiety, system instability, dogmatism/intolerance of ambiguity, closed-mindedness, low tolerance of uncertainty, high needs for order, structure, and closure, low integrative complexity, fear of threat and loss, and low self-esteem. The researchers conclude, a little chillingly, that “the core ideology of conservatism stresses resistance to change and a justification of inequality.”

                  https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/genius-and-madness/200809/is-political-conservatism-mild-form-insanity

                  • NeuromancerOPM
                    12·
                    9 months ago

                    Great but none of that is mental illness. All studies show liberals are more likely to be mentally ill and diagnosed as such