Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 7 months agoSweet Baby Inc. Doesn’t Do What Some Gamers Think It Doeskotaku.comexternal-linkmessage-square93fedilinkarrow-up191arrow-down134file-textcross-posted to: ghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
arrow-up157arrow-down1external-linkSweet Baby Inc. Doesn’t Do What Some Gamers Think It Doeskotaku.comStopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square93fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: ghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
minus-squareThrowawaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down5·7 months agoEasier to just link you to a youtube video that does that for me. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1G-BDswd6M
minus-squareExocrinouslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 months agoWow, a youtube video. What a great source. That’s why academic papers and Wikipedia cite youtube so often
minus-squarePipedLinkBot@feddit.rocksBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·7 months agoHere is an alternative Piped link(s): https://www.piped.video/watch?v=-1G-BDswd6M Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
minus-squaregeekwithsoullinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down5·7 months agoSo you don’t actually have a source then? What a surprise considering your post history and the communities you’re a mod for.
minus-squareTar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down6·7 months agoA mod in Conservative, I’m very not surprised.
minus-squareThrowawaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down7·7 months agoMore like it’s not worth tracking down the archives for deleted tweets.
minus-squaregeekwithsoullinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down4·7 months agoWell, I guess if the claim is not worth backing up, it’s probably not worth listening to. Thanks!
minus-squareThrowawaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down6·7 months agoWhens the last time you saw anyone actually read a provided source?
minus-squaregeekwithsoullinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down3·7 months agoSo you admit you provided a bullshit YouTube link because you’re not engaging with any sort of good faith intent to inform? You must be fun at parties
minus-squareExocrinouslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 months agoI do it all the time. You seem to be the kind of person who never reads sources, doesn’t know anyone who reads sources, and doesn’t see the point of having sources. The point of having sources is to determine the truth.
Easier to just link you to a youtube video that does that for me. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1G-BDswd6M
Wow, a youtube video. What a great source. That’s why academic papers and Wikipedia cite youtube so often
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://www.piped.video/watch?v=-1G-BDswd6M
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
So you don’t actually have a source then? What a surprise considering your post history and the communities you’re a mod for.
A mod in Conservative, I’m very not surprised.
More like it’s not worth tracking down the archives for deleted tweets.
Well, I guess if the claim is not worth backing up, it’s probably not worth listening to. Thanks!
Whens the last time you saw anyone actually read a provided source?
So you admit you provided a bullshit YouTube link because you’re not engaging with any sort of good faith intent to inform?
You must be fun at parties
I do it all the time. You seem to be the kind of person who never reads sources, doesn’t know anyone who reads sources, and doesn’t see the point of having sources.
The point of having sources is to determine the truth.