Stella Assange speaking to the Luxembourg Parliament on the persecution of Julian Assange

  • Peaty@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are those organizations accused of directly being involved on an individual level in hacks against the USA? Because the allegations against Assange are that he directly was involved in the hack.

      • Peaty@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        "The superseding indictment alleges that Assange was complicit with Chelsea Manning, a former intelligence analyst in the U.S. Army, in unlawfully obtaining and disclosing classified documents related to the national defense. Specifically, the superseding indictment alleges that Assange conspired with Manning; obtained from Manning and aided and abetted her in obtaining classified information with reason to believe that the information was to be used to the injury of the United States or the advantage of a foreign nation; received and attempted to receive classified information having reason to believe that such materials would be obtained, taken, made, and disposed of by a person contrary to law; and aided and abetted Manning in communicating classified documents to Assange. "

        https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/wikileaks-founder-julian-assange-charged-18-count-superseding-indictment

        Sounds like this is exactly what he is charged with.

        • SLfgb@feddit.nlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Doesn’t sound like a hack at all. Sounds like they’re saying she gave him docs.

          • Peaty@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you read the whole thing it’s that he directed Manning as to what docs to get and advised her how to get them.

              • Peaty@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                No they do not do that everyday. If a journalist tells you what secret documents to take they are a co-conspirator in the crime. If all he did was receive the documents completely unsolicited then he would have broken no laws. The allegation is that he was directly involved in the planning stages.

    • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      You are missing the point. I’m not using the editorial bias as an excuse to put the man in a death row.