- cross-posted to:
- aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/10568520
cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/1011094
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.
The original was posted on /r/aboringdystopia by /u/bisexualbestfriend on 2023-10-04 15:06:06.
You must log in or register to comment.
holy shit the black power fist “vote no”
I think that’s actually a person holding a letter or ballot, but yeah, this imagery is sick (bad kind of sick)
dues deducted from your paycheck
i’d much rather have surplus value deducted from my paycheckIf your company is putting up anti-union propaganda, it’s time to unionize.
it’s afraid!
Unions are like condoms. If they say you don’t need one, you really need one.
IIRC Amazon has ludicrous turnover in their warehouses so the “do you want to gamble on better conditions?” point seems kind of ineffective. Like okay do I want to maybe get better conditions or definitely burn out in 4 months and quit?
They do. had a friend that could only handle working in an Amazon warehouse for a few months
It’s bad
I know people who’ve tried to salt in these warehouses and, well, even here it’s hard to physically find the time and energy. They actually use pathing algorithms that reduce efficiency to prevent employees from having too much contact.
A union is a new concept for most marginal workers. This means that for them to make the leap, they’ve got to overcome their uncertainty. If a company can cast even a little doubt, it can be tremendously effective.
The traditional way to overcome this is to have coworkers be the ones advocating for a union, not staff. This is really hard at Amazon because of the high turnover. If you look at JFK8, Smalls was a manager, i.e., one of the only people not turning over every 3 months.
high turnover rate is actually good for the capitalists. It means a large reserve army of labor. it means a fresh supply of scabs. it means people will quit ‘‘before’’ they even ‘‘try’’ to unionize because they’ve been taught that’s what you do when a job sucks, you quit and get a new one that also sucks, and so on to infinity. Quitting will ‘‘always’’ be easier than unionizing, and people only unionize when they think “this is my job, I’m going to be here for a long time.” Unions were strongest when people worked in the same company their whole lives. The more mobile and nomadic the work force, the easier capital is able to dissuade unionization efforts.
No guarantees on pay, benefits, or work rules
isnt this literally the thing unions are meant to solve? What kind of reverse psychology is this?
It’s a threat.
That’s not reverse psychology, it’s projection
“We have no intention of ever negotiating. Don’t even bother trying to unionize.”
Removed by mod
Pretty sure this is illegal. That said, laws don’t mean anything to a trillion dollar company.
Even if they are fined 10 million dollars (about 10 million more than they’ll ever be fined) (what they make in about a minute) it will absolutely pale in comparison to their savings from union-busting.
The last contract between IBT and UPS transferred $30,000,000,000 (that’s 10 zeroes, thirty billion in the US) to the workers.
If you want labor law to be meaningful, that’s what the fines have got to amount to.
You hit the nail on the head lol
Hey, they are just trying to make a living. Blame the corporations, not the workers. Unless i misunderstood you meaning.
I have to imagine they mean, like, whichever marketing fuck accepted the assignment to make these posters (and the people who decided the content, of course). I don’t think they mean warehouse workers or drivers, but they also should have been more specific.
Removed by mod
So the very people being prevented from unionizing are a waste of oxygen, according to you?
No calls to violence, especially.
It’s toxic and the comment was directed to the unorganized.
I hope this backfires. They’re one of the richest companies in the world and the most notorious for treating their workers like shit. Anything they claim is bad for their workers will almost certainly be good for them. I hope people see through this.
The “no guarantees” part is also very telling. It’s like they’re admitting that they’ll do whatever they can to avoid improving pay and conditions even if the workers start a union.
Do you really want to be at
’s mercy with no guarantees?How are people dumb enough to realize “of course the corporation would tell you not to unionize against them”?
“No guarantee on pay” is a threat. Workers know who benefits from a union and who loses, Amazon is just threatening to cut pay and benefits if they organize.
As opposed to without a union, where you’re guaranteed to have terrible pay, benefits, and working conditions. But at least you can also talk to your boss!
I know what the anti-union line is, and I know how it’s supposed to be effective, but does anyone see this shit and think “oh, yeah, I definitely trust my manager to give a shit about even one request I have.” Like I don’t think I’ve ever had a job where I didn’t fantasize occasionally about my immediate superior getting hit by a car.
deleted by creator
