Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to Europe@feddit.deEnglish · 11 months agoGerman power mix may get dirtier for 1st non-nuclear winterwww.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square72fedilinkarrow-up193arrow-down143
arrow-up150arrow-down1external-linkGerman power mix may get dirtier for 1st non-nuclear winterwww.reuters.comLee Duna@lemmy.nz to Europe@feddit.deEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square72fedilink
minus-squareMurvellinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoAnd what difference does that make if it’s a comment, article or whatever the fuck you call it? Damn you’re dense…
minus-squareMrMakabar@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoThe difference is that it is the opinion of the author. An article would be repeating facts, which this does, but it also tries to put them into a context by giving his opinion on the matter. If you care to look him up, you will find that he has the job of covering the energy transition for a bit over a year and his background is in trading agricultural commodities and he has a business degree. If you look at some other articles for example you have this: https://financialpost.com/pmn/business-pmn/germany-to-use-lowest-amount-of-energy-on-record-this-year Please not this is not an opioion piece, with commentary or something similar at the top and it is quoting more scientific sources.
minus-squareMurvellinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoAgain, how does that make this piece a “hypothetical cirkle-jerk” when it’s clearly supported by sourced data?
And what difference does that make if it’s a comment, article or whatever the fuck you call it? Damn you’re dense…
The difference is that it is the opinion of the author. An article would be repeating facts, which this does, but it also tries to put them into a context by giving his opinion on the matter. If you care to look him up, you will find that he has the job of covering the energy transition for a bit over a year and his background is in trading agricultural commodities and he has a business degree.
If you look at some other articles for example you have this: https://financialpost.com/pmn/business-pmn/germany-to-use-lowest-amount-of-energy-on-record-this-year
Please not this is not an opioion piece, with commentary or something similar at the top and it is quoting more scientific sources.
Again, how does that make this piece a “hypothetical cirkle-jerk” when it’s clearly supported by sourced data?