This is a bit political but i feel this should be looked at. Whatever it’s on on the Lemmy instance or the Mastodon instances.

My main concern is about the concept of Embrase Extend Extinguish they could use.

  • Tathar makes stuff@furry.engineer
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    @crashdoom @brodokk

    Commenting with this as context: https://merveilles.town/@lrhodes/110555014534253768

    Project 92 wouldn’t fit in with the Networked Communities philosophy that I use Fedi for. Normally that would just call for a silence, but given Meta’s extremely poor stewardship of people’s data in the past, especially those who didn’t opt into the data collection in the first place, I think a preemptive full-defederation is warranted rather than a silence. It seems like a Rule 6 matter, too.

    • Tathar makes stuff@furry.engineer
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      @crashdoom @brodokk

      I’m not asking for Meta to be chased out of the fediverse or for there to be a widespread fediblock. In fact, I think Project 92 could fit in just fine with masto.soc and all the other general-purpose instances, provided that they’re better data stewards moving forward than before. That’s just not why I’m here, and I don’t want them to feel entitled to my data, even if there’s no technical way to stop them from getting access to it.