• @OldWoodFrame
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2214 days ago

    Here before 38 million of Kenya’s 53 million population demand the government steps down and reinstates Altman.

    • @LWDOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1014 days ago

      I understand and appreciate the carefully calculated 5÷7 reference

  • theodewere
    link
    fedilink
    1914 days ago

    i’m with Kenya on this… why would anyone allow Sam Altman to scan their eyeballs?

    • @LWDOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      314 days ago

      I can only think of two, completely contradictory reasons

      • Actually needs the money
      • Has plenty of money, thinks this will get them even more
  • @_s10e@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    614 days ago

    That was less than 24hours ago. Let’s just wait what happens.

    Either Microsoft buys Kenya or Sam Altman is promoted to King of Narnia.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    414 days ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Kenya is pumping the brakes on Worldcoin — the eyeball-scanning crypto project launched by OpenAI founder Sam Altman.

    The Kenyan government has ordered Worldcoin to stop collecting data in the country while it reviews the project for potential privacy and security risks, as reported earlier by Reuters.

    The project launched last week and has had people lining up to get their eyeballs scanned by the shiny, silver orbs Worldcoin has set up in major cities around the globe.

    In a press release, the Communications Authority of Kenya says it’s going to evaluate Worldcoin due to a “lack of clarity on the security and storage” of the iris scans it’s collecting as well as the “uncertainty” surrounding the attached cryptocurrency.

    As a result of the suspension, authorities had to turn away thousands of people waiting in line to get their iris scanned, the Kenyan newspaper The Standard reports.

    Despite this, Worldcoin maintains that “biometric data never leaves the orb” and is “permanently deleted” after you sign up.


    The original article contains 395 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 58%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • @tsonfeir
    link
    fedilink
    English
    313 days ago

    Serious question: would you sell your biometric data, and the rights to it? And what’s the price, realistically?

  • @5BC2E7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    114 days ago

    I think that the major issue is that they were paying a one time fee for whatever rights they claimed about the biometrics. They should be paying monthly fees instead.

    • @LWDOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      014 days ago

      I don’t think you can enforce a monthly fee for something thrown onto a blockchain. People have talked about putting rent payments on the blockchain, and privacy issues aside, each month of rent is unique. You only get one set of retinas!

      A lot of cryptocurrency evangelists have tried getting people to put literally anything on the blockchain, including their own personal data, promising “once it’s there, people will pay you for it, you have total governance of your data!” without mentioning once somebody purchases that data and unlocks it, they can just copy it as easily as the average person copies monkey pictures, but with far more potential resale value (compared to getting people to purchase a stolen PNG, at least).