Yes, I know that it still exist, and yes, decentralized currency which utilizes distributed, cryptographic validation is not actually a strictly bad idea, but…

Is the speculative investment scam, which crypto substantially represented, finally dead? Can we go back to buying gold bars and Pokemon cards?

I feel like it is, but I’m having a hard time putting my finger on why it lost its sheen. Maybe crypto scammers moved on to selling LLM “prompts?” Maybe the rug just got pulled enough times that everyone lost trust.

  • limelight79
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    And shouldn’t the environmental cost of “real” currencies be compared as well? It’s not like printing and minting all those bills and coins is zero energy. Even treating it virtually (direct deposit, etc - we rarely handle cash) has some overhead.

    I don’t have a horse in this race, but comments that are obviously trying to grind an ace are suspicious to me.

    • HER0@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      On the tech side of things, the environmental impact of running traditional, centralized services is inherently lower than running any cryptocurrency off of a blockchain. To overcome the technical limitations would be to create another centralized service.

      But yeah, there are almost certainly ways that traditional currency can reduce their environmental impact, too.

    • Landrin201@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, it shouldn’t be compared to real currencies, because real currencies are real currencies that literally 99% of humanity is using literally every day to buy and sell goods.

      It’s like someone saying “I know that I am running a coal power plant out of my backyard that produces gigawatts of power every day that only I consume, but the rest of the country is also running on coal power too so I’m not the problem!”