• BroBot9000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes cause new ideas are risky and scary to the executives. Oh no, a new concept might not rake in buckets of nostalgia money. Can’t risk people not liking something new, let’s regurgitate every possible franchise and property in the pursuit of unending growth of the box office revenue.

    • roguetrick@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s not a new thing. Look back to radio dramas and dime novels and you’ll see the same thing.

    • WarmSoda
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If by “now” you mean the entire history of cinema, then yes.

  • TWeaK
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seeing as the article doesn’t really say much about the movie itself, just the logitistics and financials of making it:

    with Cage reprising his role as arms dealer Yuri Orlov, and Skarsgard on board to play his son. In Lords of War, Orlov discovers he has a son, Anton, who is trying to top his father’s wrongs rather than stop them as he launches a mercenary army to fight America’s Middle East conflicts.

    Source

  • Bri Guy @sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    please please please just be entertaining to watch, i don’t mind seeing more unhinged nic cage!

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thought that read “‘Lord of the Rings’ Sequel” when I was first scanning the headline and was a bit confused.