• @xkforce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    This is a very dubious paper.

    *Arxiv is a preprint server and isnt peer reviewed

    *Critical temperature claims are far above other groups

    *Other claims of high temperature superconductivity required high pressures/extreme conditions

    *The paper itself has several proofreading mistakes and isnt written in a professional manner

    *No replication of claims

    *The material is a Copper substituted Lead II phosphate which is… questionable