• TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zipEnglish
    5·
    11 months ago

    Curious for anyone who has played both how does it compare. Will I actually care or need to make more than one character. Is there a point to adventure mode or a reason to want to get more stuff past beating hard mode?

    Survival wasn’t my thing so I finished basically the entirety of the game in 40hrs and then it was just pointless to play more?

    But like it was a great game. Felt good to play and all. Definitely recommend it. Just hoping the 2nd brings something more motivating.

    • sleepisajokeanyway@kbin.social
      5·
      11 months ago

      The second feels like the first but better, they built on what was there and added a class/subclass system. I played through the first a couple of times but I think the new archetype system in the second adds a lot of replayability and I’ll do more than just two characters in this one probably unless I completely forget about it when Armored Core comes out. Also the world generation seems way more varied this time around at first glance

      • GeneralCricket@lemmy.zipEnglish
        6·
        11 months ago

        Single player or multiplayer coop up to 3 people. It’s not a mmo or anything of that nature, no. Multiplayer progression works like in Grim Dawn where the host progresses their game and character; people that join don’t progress their own campaign progress, but do progress their character.

        Edit: more info.

  • DeriHunter@lemmy.worldEnglish
    2·
    11 months ago

    After platinum in the first I’m having a blast in the second! I just wish there were more ps players, no one joined me yet and I played remnant 1 on pc all week and people joined constantly