Oh shit they’ve got him.
Can someone explain to me why we have 🦀’s out for this one? It’s not like he’s a hero or anything, I certainly am not going to miss him, but I thought he was basically just a somewhat more anti corruption, anti-immigration, and in other ways more socially progressive version of Putin who just got
’d for trying to organize an equally shitty party to most of the other parties, including United Russia and Putin’s All-Russian People’s Fronte: good discussion below, tl;dr he has earned his crabs
He’s a fascist of the neo Nazi variety. Constantly dehumanized Caucasians (of the Caucasus mountains like chechens dagastanis Georgians Armenians etc). He’s basically the zelenskiyiyiyiyi of Russia
I can’t find anything on the neo-nazi thing in particular (I don’t doubt it), but he’s certainly fash, no doubt. I’m just suggesting that he’s anti-immigration fash standing in opposition to pro-assimilation fash. The only reason anti-immigration seems to be such an anti-state position in Russia is because Putin has correctly read that Russia has a population crisis and is seeking to remedy that by turning foreigners into Russians. Navalny doesn’t seem more or less fascist than Putin, he just seems to have a different idea as to what to do with the Other. Which is I guess a reason to bring the 🦀s out, but no more or less so than when Putin kicks it, besides that Putin is a very expedient thorn in
’s side.The one biggest reason I could imagine celebrating Navalny’s death is that he is the enemy of our enemy’s enemy (Navalny/The West/Putin). Besides that, he’s just as fash as a lot of folks who we critically support due to their relation to the West, like Lukashenko and Assad.
I wonder how the libs, who love this guy, will react to this.
“Since the tsars”… SINCE the tsars?
They defederated and instantly went straight to the calipers, incredible.
Holy. It’s gone from mild thinly veiled liberal level racism to strait up fascist “scientific” racism real fast.
racism aside… are liberals seriously approving the idea that the people were “free” under the absolute monarchy of the tsars? literally what is the point of liberalism in that case? they should be proud of the French Revolution and anti-monarchism
Anti-revolutionarism is more important to them I guess.
Libs will be more worked up about this than the continuing genocide and ethnic cleansing in Gaza plus the injuries, suffering, and death in the West Bank.
Hmm, I wonder why
Well of course. They tend to be driven by the suffering of dogs than people.
