Cars haven’t been allowed on the corridor since 2020, but now some are saying that the car-free experiment should end.

  • GlitterInfection@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    I will say that the current setup is very pointless.

    Since the road isn’t actually closed it can’t be repurposed for pedestrian or business uses like they do when they close off Valencia.

    It’s just a few cyclists and some confused theater patrons jaywalking from time to time.

  • 3volver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    They think allowing cars will revitalize their downtown area? Funny. Office real estate is fucked, letting cars on one more street won’t do shit to help.

  • oohgodyeah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t completely agree that opening Market St so some new traffic is a bad idea. If the intent is to ensure public transit isn’t impeded, why are Taxi Cabs allowed? If taxis can use it with a single rider, then why not ride shares like Uber/Lyft? Why is a dropff in a ride share different from a taxi?

    • infotainment@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Seems they are aware of that problem, according to the article:

      Taxis can use Market Street but Uber and Lyft can’t — an aspect of the system that even planners say has problems, since so many people use those ride-booking options, but there’s no obvious way to let them cross 10th Street without allowing all other drivers, too.

  • robocall@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    I love biking on car free market street. I wish there were more streets with limited car access, and notice a fair amount of cars still driving on market street.