• golli
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Seems pretty solid, but really nothing revolutionary. The battery life tests seem a bit pointless with so vastly different laptops, and that would have been one of the most interesting aspect.

    • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      There is a big delta between the marketing and hype (that they started almost a year before release) and the actual results.

      This was to be expected though, it was clear that they were notably malicious in their PR strategy.

      For example, the first geekbench 6 results that they posted were completely disconnected from reality:

      https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/3326083

      3,233 ST / 16,947 MT; seems to be running on 100% fans, on the power cord and running some custom, internal build of linux.

      • golli
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Was that result for this SKU or the higher ones? I think there are supposed to be two other versions that clock a bit higher, which will likely reduce battery life though.

        But you are right the hype cycle was extremely long and doesn’t really mesh with the middling results.

        • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          This a lower end X Elite (their intro series is called X Plus), so yes it doesn’t clock as high as the top end X Elite SKU.