• dinckel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nintendo would see the sky fall down before they would do something like this, because unlike idSoftware, who release good work, make their money, and move on, Nintendo would re-release the same stuff 5 times, except it’s always more expensive the next time

    • genoxidedev1@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would literally not hurt them to open source anything <= 3DS now after the eshop closure. The act of doing that and everything that would come of it (e.g. rom hacks) would actually be a pretty good PR move imo and maybe they’d even find new developers, acquainted with their code, that could be hired by them so they have developers that actually know how to develop good and optimized games.

      One can sadly only dream.

  • JPiolho@lemmy.jpiolho.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 year ago

    Note that this is only the game code that allows people to develop mods, and not engine code that allows people to do ports. The re-release engine code is still proprietary.

    They did the same with Quake 1 re-release game code

    • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Quake 2 has been GPL and had Linux versions since forever, even official ones from id.

      I assume this remaster uses the same engine. Maybe they used stuff from contributors/forks, that’s why they kept it open.

      • GreenMario
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Remaster uses “The Kex E.ngine”, however I don’t know if that’s an actual game engine or a portability layer of some kind.

      • Vilian@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        true, in the official source code they say that was only tested the build in linux lol, and in the first doom they said that was only playable on linux :b

        • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          IIRC the guy who was doing the official Linux builds of the old id games was also the one who was publishing the code, so that’s probably why.

          They could never publish everything they had internally, as they used proprietary or patented bits in places, so the code always needed cleaning up before GPLing it. That’s why Doom engine source was released without the sound, the Doom 3 engine had the shadowing code replaced, Quake 3 code didn’t have the single-player parts because people were still licencing it in the mid-00’s, and other such stuff.

          And yes, Doom was originally developed for *nix, I think they were using NeXT machines or something like that, for development.

    • ouigol@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The license doesn’t really matter, unless you mean it should be included in the kernel. If it was another permissive license, you could also port it to Linux. I have no clue if it’s actually possible to port it to Linux natively, but I would guess that you can

      • Vilian@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        no clue if it’s actually possible to port it to Linux natively

        its’s open source, you can, now how easily…