• CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I used to not have any doubts about a Roth, but I’ve been considering that maybe it’s a little too much like giving the government a free loan. Do you know if there’s a thorough comparison anywhere between a traditional and Roth IRA that takes into consideration the opportunity cost of paying tax on the contributions?

    • Zeeber@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Compound interest will far outweigh paying taxes now for a Roth. Especially if you also have a 401k, the taxes in retirement will be potentially large based on the growth of the fund over decades. A Roth makes it so you pay nominal taxes now for potential large tax free growth later.

      The exception would be if you think your income will decrease in your later working years, in which case a traditional IRA could make more sense. That however is a unique case. Generally it’s better to take advantage of a Roth if you can for tax free gains later.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Here’s a useful comparison.

      The biggest question is, do you think your tax percentage will be higher now, or higher in the future? If you think your income might increase later (placing you in a higher tax bracket), or that the government might increase your tax burden later, then it’s better to pay taxes now.