Meta can introduce their signature rage farming to the Fediverse. They don’t need to control Mastodon. All they have to do is introduce it in their app. Show every Threads user algorithmically filtered content from the Fediverse precisely tailored for maximum rage. When the rage inducing content came from Mastodon, the enraged Thread users will flood that Mastodon threads with the familiar rage-filled Facebook comment section vomit. This in turn will enrage Mastodon users, driving them to engage, at least in the short to mid term. All the while Meta sells ads in-between posts. And that’s how they rage farm the Fediverse without EEE-ing the technology. Meta can effectively EEE the userbase. The last E is something Meta may not intend but would likely happen. It consists of a subset of the Fediverse users leaving the network or segregating themselves in a small vomit-free bubble.

Some people asked what EEE is:

  • tj111@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Next year EU is going to make all tech giants open in this way again

    Can you expand on that?

    • misk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/digital-markets-act-ensuring-fair-and-open-digital-markets_en

      Examples of the “do’s” - Gatekeeper platforms will have to:

      • allow third parties to inter-operate with the gatekeeper’s own services in certain specific situations

      Example of the “don’ts” - Gatekeeper platforms may no longer:

      • treat services and products offered by the gatekeeper itself more favourably in ranking than similar services or products offered by third parties on the gatekeeper’s platform
      • prevent consumers from linking up to businesses outside their platforms
      • track end users outside of the gatekeepers’ core platform service for the purpose of targeted advertising, without effective consent having been granted