Hey everyone, I see a lot of people throwing around the term “enshittification” to describe the long-term and systemic decline of many of the centralized social media platforms, most recently Reddit. I commented this elsewhere, but thought everyone might benefit for reading Cory Doctorow’s original article coining the term. The first sentence here sums it up nicely:

“Here is how platforms die: first, they are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves. Then, they die.”

I’m a big proponent for tracing and crediting the origins of ideas, and I think this one speaks to a lot of people right now. For all its flaws and occasional user-unfriendliness, I think the main draw of the Fediverse is an escape from this profit-driven cycle.

You can also follow the Mastodon account for Cory’s blog @pluralistic (yay federation!).

  • novarime@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tldr: money

    Reddit’s draw was content. Could have been from users or aggregated from different sources. Content was provided for free by users. Content was moderated for free by mods.

    Now reddit is complaining that users consuming content via means bypassing monetisation are entitled while reddit has been freeloading for years. They’re basically infrastructure. Important but not the lifeblood.

    I hope they wither and perish.

  • DarkGamer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In the step between being good to their users and abusing their users, eternal September occurs. Early adopters tend to be curious and technically minded sorts of people, and the users that follow them, less so. Right now I’m enjoying that posts here tend to be more thoughtful and in good faith than what one usually finds on reddit.

  • narF@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wonder if we could find a better word than “enshittification”. Maybe something more descriptive?

      • narF@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m asking because some people (ex: my mom) would react badly to using such word just because there’s “shit” in it. But with a different word, she might get it and use it.
        I’m not good enough in english to find something better…

  • lawyerjsd@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a basic monopoly move. Why is Google making it’s search function shitty? Because it’s a monopoly and you won’t go to a competitor. Reddit assumes that it can make these moves because it doesn’t have a competitor, and if it did, it could buy out the competitor right now.