As Texas sweltered last month under a weekslong, record-breaking heat wave, the state passed a law that will eliminate mandatory water breaks for construction workers in cities where such ordinances had been in place to protect people from extreme heat. Now, backlash is brewing.

House Bill 2127 passed the state Legislature and Gov. Greg Abbott promptly signed it into law on June 14. The bill, which goes into effect in September, strips construction workers in Austin and Dallas of the right to water breaks every four hours and time to rest in the shade while on the job.

The new law comes as Texas endured three straight weeks of high humidity and triple-digit temperatures in June. Such intense and long-lasting heat waves are expected to become more common in a warming world, climate scientists have said.

  • HandsHurtLoL@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Brought to you by The People Making It Objectively Worse™ comes Some Professions Are Worth Dying In. Sign up for your dystopian nightmare in a world on fire, today!

  • prole@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    How could anyone reasonably defend this? The cruelty is clearly the point… Regulations like this are written in blood.

    I guess we went so long with things working marginally well (in general), that everyone is convinced that the regulations that got us there are unnecessary. Things are only going to get worse until we (maybe) learn these lessons the hard way again.

    • kuontom@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      From the bill

      Texas cities have passed burdensome local ordinances, creating a patchwork regulations across the state. These policies are better left to the employer, and if necessary, the state and federal government. Uniformity and consistent policy gives employers and employees greater clarity and flexibility.

      It’s a move aiming to centralize control of the state.

      the purpose of this Act is to provide regulatory consistency across this state and return the historic exclusive regulatory powers to the state where those powers belong.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, I know the actual reason. Just wondering how conservatives can/will try to explain their reasoning.

        “Give power back to employers” is just more anti-worker bullshit.

    • Flaky_Fish69@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      the cruelty is the point

      not really. The point is… that the GOP exist to make the 1% richer. These water breaks add up to a not-negligible amount of down time.

      You loose more when you have to stop work because your crew is dying from heat stroke, but… details.

  • CannedTuna@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, Greg Abbott is a massive piece of shit. I’m hoping OSHA will have some say in this matter considering how they’ve been pushing Heat Prevention the last couple years. I’m not sure if they have power to enforce breaks from the heat through fines or not, but no employer wants to get hit by them.

    See: Water, Shade, Rest

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I imagine the only way OSHA would have the power to do that, is if Congress passes a federal law to supercede the Texas law. I could be wrong though, not exactly an expert on OSHA’s purview.

      • admiralteal@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The Occupational Safety and Health Act, which established and gave authority to OSHA, is federal law that supersedes Texas law so long as it is in force.

        The law allows states to set up their own local jurisdictions if they so chose. Texas has not so chosen, so federal OSHA has authority there.

        • CannedTuna@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s a good point.

          There’s also the General Duty Clause which states that it is an employers duty to provide a workplace free from recognized hazards that may cause death or serious physical injury.

          Given that, I would say regardless of Abbott stripping the stricter safety requirement, employers are still legally obligated to provide water, shade, and rest to employees working in the extreme Texas summer heat.

          Edit: added link