The only way to generate CSAM is by abusing children and taking pictures/videos of it.
Society has decided otherwise, as I wrote, you can’t have your own facts or definitions. You might as well claim that in traffic red means go, because you have your own interpretation of how traffic lights should work.
Red is legally decided to mean stop, so that’s how it is, that’s how our society works by definition.
There’s a reason it’s legally considered CSAM. as I explained it is material that depicts it.
You can’t have your own facts, especially not contrary to what’s legally determined, because that means your definition or understanding is actually ILLEGAL!! If you act based on it.
CSAM = Child sexual abuse material
Even virtual material is still legally considered CSAM in most places. Although no children were hurt, it’s a depiction of it, and that’s enough.
First of all, it’s by definition not CSAM if it’s AI generated. It’s simulated CSAM
This is blatantly false. It’s also illegal and you can go to prison for owning selling or making child Lolita dolls.
I don’t know why this is the legal position in most places. Because as you mention no one is harmed.
true, I thought it was, but apparently not. But it was in the Russian sphere of communist “eastern block” countries.
Responsible to who?
Of course they will sell if there’s a profit to be made. Companies exist to make profits, if they can make a profit from it, it’s actually their responsibility to the shareholders to do it.
Maybe you mean responsible in some way that has to do with morals, but if you think morals apart from staying within the law, have any say in this whatsoever, you are being very naive. That’s not at all how the system works.
That said I don’t see any other way than corruption for Musk to be interested. Musk buys Intel, and Trump doubles the subsidies to Intel and give them extra sweet government contracts. And everybody profit, except the stupid taxpayers including those that voted Trump.
Only the law helps super capitalist narcissists to stay at least somewhat within moral norms.
And in USA the law doesn’t even count anymore. So there you go, everything is fucked up, until Americans figure it out. Which means it will be fucked up for a loooong time.
I never claimed climate change couldn’t cause increased prices. But EU has lots of spare farmland that farmers are paid to NOT use to REDUCE production to avoid huge stockpiles like we had in the 70’s.
EU can increase production a lot if we want.
So as I wrote EU is not and is not likely to become dependent on Ukrainian grain.
The ones that really don’t get it are former Warsaw pact areas like Hungary, Slovakia and Serbia. Who actively SUPPORT Russia!
That vehicles number is relatively low compared to what we’ve been used to the past couple of months.
Seems Russians are running out of golf carts and scooters now.
Slava Ukraini.
True, but as it is now, farmers in EU are actually paid for NOT farming as much as they can. EU can increase production significantly within a year. But yes that would mean that prices would increase on some products, but I don’t think it would increase very much on meat, although it would probably make fodder a bit more expensive.
EU has capacity for significant surplus production overall, and we could shift a lot of imported products to products grown in the EU.
Just think about the fact that in any democratic country, the current economic situation in Russia would have caused the government to be thrown out long ago- even without considering all the casualties from the war.
That’s a VERY good point.
You are aware the Soviet union collapsed due to economic reasons right?
Russia is in just about the exact same position now that the Soviet Union was back then.
At least he improved the lives of those 2500 people.
det jo netop ikke skader noget
Det kan man måske påstå, men hvis folk tror på “behandlingen” kan det betyde de ikke søger reel behandling, og hvis folk “misbruger” bet, kan det have negativ økonomisk effekt.
Så jeg er ikke sikker på man kan påstå at bare fordi vand er relativt uskadeligt, er det derfor også uskadeligt at påstå det virker som medicin.
Men ellers enig i at pseudomedicin er humbug.
Ja det er lige nøjagtigt det jeg mener. Det er bedrageri uanset om så dem der bruger det tror på besynderlige historier om gavnlige vibrationer i vandet. Det er dokumenteret at det ikke virker.
Homøopati burde være ulovligt af samme årsag som pyramidespil er det.
Der er en chance for at folk ville blive større modstandere af rigtig medicin hvis man gjorde pseudomedicin forbudt.
Kunne der ikke også være en chance for at nogle af dem der er mere fornuftige, erkender at der er en grund til at man forbyder det?
Men som jeg skrev, kunne man som kompromis sige at det skal være mærket som placebo.
Eu is mostly self sufficient on base foods:
https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-11/efscm-assessment-autumn-2023_en.pdf
If you look at fig. 4 on page 5, almost every meat source is above 100%, and fig 5 show most plant foods vary between 60-130%.
In the 70’s the ECC which EU was called back then, turned European agriculture around from huge deficits to huge surpluses. To ensure self sufficiency in case of international destabilization. This resulted in enormous stockpiles, leading to a more balanced policy, which we seem to have achieved.
In short EU is NOT dependent on food from Ukraine, but others are.
We do import soy and maize, but have a surplus on grains.
Omvendelsesterapi burde klart være forbudt, eftersom det er dokumenteret til at være decideret psykisk skadeligt, og når det er ufrivilligt fungerer det som afpresning og tortur. Hvis forældre sender børn i omvendelsesterapi er det decideret børnemishandling.
Når vi nu er i gang, burde homøopatisk “medicin” vel også have været forbudt siden 70’erne hvor det allerede var dokumenterbart det ikke har nogen effekt over placebo. Som minimum burde det være mærket som placebo.
Putin will absolutely care when his beloved Russian federation collapses because he has been an idiot.
Yeah I could, I guess I was a bit annoyed by the laziness of the post.
And I maintain it’s bad style to not include a simple link to where “he” got the photo.
As someone else mentioned, that’s how fake news are often spread.
Just saw a video of it, that’s not just Nazi like, that is a textbook ENTHUSIASTIC NAZI SALUTE!