similar sure but different. usually served cold. and you can mix it with lemonade to make a cocktail called a “snowball”

and it’s fucking delicious.

It’s alcoholic custard

I drink it every Christmas

you probably could do it if you couldn’t turn your head, move your body or use the remote

I worked in education circa 2000-2016, every age from newborn to 20-somethings, nursery, pre school, most school ages, teens, young offenders institutes.

Pretty sure I would be a good dad as I kept my cool even when i got stabbed in the arm

Wife doesn’t want kids and I’m not that bothered either way. Happy to be “Uncle” to my friends’ kids.

there are enough vacant homes in the US to give every homeless person in America person 6 of them and have some spare.

fuckya life BING BONG

unfortunately Cleese in his elder years hasn’t really moved with the times. While this quote is fairly right-on, he’s also said a bunch of fairly right-wing crap too.

on a personal level, yes, but also there is such a thing as considering other people too.

edit: didn’t mean to sound snarky, just saying that there are other reasons to oppose this than “it affects me personally”

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_television_series_that_changed_networks

Republicans in general are, as I would put it, in the pockets of banks, and someone more sympathetic to them would put it, “fiscally responsible.” (An epithet I consider risible, but anyway…)

They have vocally and legally and through the legislature opposed and prevented, rolled back and increased the requirements to forgive student loans. A sympathetic person to their cause would say this is a moral choice because you should “repay what you owe,” me, I don’t buy that and would argue they get lots of donations from big banks to keep their cash cow alive.

Due to them being so ideologically opposed to so-called “debt forgiveness” (a misnomer to me as you can have paid back your loan multiplicatively but still be charged for it for the rest of your life due to interest and fees) makes people worry they will continue that beyond simply annuling Biden’s administration’s efforts and further push it to roll back decades-old protections and programmes.

Why? Well, as mentioned, a sympathetic viewer might call it “The right thing to do” if you believe that, say, if someone takes out loans to become a teacher, and there is a forgiveness programme that says if you teach for 10 years, teaching is so valuable and so understaffed that as a reward they’ll forgive your loans, and you believe that is an unconsciable burden on the financial institutions that service the loans, and They Should Have Thought About That before taking up their profession- then you would take steps to eliminate such a program and ensure that those rascally teachers pay back their full debt that is owed, plus interest and fees.

Would that negatively affect education? Yes, but there are many (many!) people who believe that is an unfortunate but necessary side effect.

“But that sounds illogicial”

Within living memory we had the red scare, the lavender/pink scare, Jim Crow and segregation. All of which were considered legal and “moral” (by some) at the time.

Yes, you’d expect so, however on average you’ll be applying to 100 jobs per 1 interview, and if you get an interview with a company that doesn’t list it, it’s another 100 applications before one rolls around, might as well take the interview and ask.

Removed by mod

christ I can’t fucking believe it’s still happening

The Guardian definitely hates the Tories though so this doesn’t hold up.

Then select Format > Text

Same, it felt like it was trying to be a bake-off-nice version of The Great

name checked in NIN too, same album as the fist fuck lyric

since they repealed the Fairness Doctrine (not that it was perfect) in the late 80s when they realized that balanced reporting was one of the things that forced Nixon’s resignation

except Paul Rudd

Quantum physics and… 23 years? Does anyone in their mid 40s look as good as they did in their early 20s?