Kind of weird to say you can’t ascribe a purpose to the beneficial mutations and that they must do something. You say they have no purpose, then say they’re beneficial (which is a purpose), then almost explicitly say that they must have a purpose.
No, they said not to ascribe a purpose, but that it obviously has purpose. Those are not the same thing. There is purpose, but we should not presume to understand or identify said purpose.
Kind of weird to say you can’t ascribe a purpose to the beneficial mutations and that they must do something. You say they have no purpose, then say they’re beneficial (which is a purpose), then almost explicitly say that they must have a purpose.
No, they said not to ascribe a purpose, but that it obviously has purpose. Those are not the same thing. There is purpose, but we should not presume to understand or identify said purpose.