Right wing authoritarianism isn’t subtle.


edit:

added context:

Here is what Ben is replying to:

Pro-Palestinian protesters a part of a group called “𝐏𝐚𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐀𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧,” vandalized a historic painting of Arthur James Balfour at Trinity College Cambridge in England.

Arthur Balfour wrote the Balfour Declaration of 1917 when he was serving as the British Foreign Minister. The letter expressed Britain’s support for a Jewish Homeland in what is now Israel.

Direct link(should work for a bit): https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1766117900644151296/vid/avc1/720x1280/pQDXaeuPY2vYbJdX.mp4?tag=14

  • Ilovethebomb
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    3 months ago

    I never thought I’d say this, but I’m with Ben on this one. That was an artwork painted long before any living person was born, and should be still around long after any of us die.

    Destroying history in the name of a cause should never be acceptable.

    • astreus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      …Arthur Balfour died in 1930 and was painted in 1914 (7 years after the oldest living person was born). It’s hanging in Trinity College, not the National Gallery. It’s really not a culturally significant piece of art.

      • Ilovethebomb
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        The painting is actually more recent than I thought, but destroying it is still scummy.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The house I just bought has pipes almost as old, and just as artistically significant as this random nonsense. I’m still going to replace them

    • zazo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      Ok let’s extend your logic to its maxima - so what you’re saying is that if you had to choose between destroying all paintings in the world or everyone dying - you’d choose everyone to die and save the paintings?

      Most sane centrist ever…

      • astreus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Your heart is in the right place, but this is a strawman argument.

        People do die for culture, choose to die to protect their heritage. I’m sure there’s several philosophy PhDs worth of conversation to be had about that.

        In this case: no history has been lost, no culture destroyed, and nothing of value lost. I suggest avoiding getting lost in hypotheticals because the actual case is a lot more clear cut. No one should lose their lives (inc the damage of a lengthy prison sentence) for this instance.

      • S_204
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’d reserve that for those who live in maximal terms. They’re worth less than the paintings 😘