• Tobberone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Well, omnipotency is out, I believe. An omnipotent god needs, by definition, be equally able and likely to be exceedingly cruel as wellwilling. The question is, why would such a god hav given Noah the task of building an arc in the first place?

    And the question of humanities “free will” is another nail in the coffin. Either humans only have free will for as much as whatever whim the omnipotent god allows for, or of the free will is immutable, then there is one thing the “omnipotent” god can’t do, and thus omnipotence is out…

    • magnusrufus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      An omnipotent god needs, by definition, be equally able and likely to be exceedingly cruel as wellwilling.

      How do you figure that?

      • Tobberone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        As i said, by definition. If there is anything holding such a deity from doing one thing, or the other, it is unable to do all things, thus not omnipotent.

        • magnusrufus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think it would help if I knew what definition you were using, I’m not sure where the equally likely part comes from. I think there would be a distinction between an omnipotent being being able to do a thing and choosing to do a thing.