Former White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said that President Trump’s recent meeting with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán shows that he “wants to be a dictator.” “I think you’…
Oh look at all that good hard evidence you are providing. Very convincing. It’s not just “forget your hard evidence. Look at my vague accusations that make me suspicious!”
Do you realize that I’ve had “debates” with Trump supporters that follow virtually the same exact pattern? It’s funny how much my fellow Sanders supporters can sound like Trump supporters.
>It’s funny how much my fellow Sanders supporters can sound like Trump supporters.
this is called pigeonholing, and it’s a sort of ad-hominem by association. it’s intellectually dishonest, and doesn’t change the truth of anything i’ve said.
I apologize. I thought you had said something earlier about supporting Sanders, and when I’ve had this debate before it’s almost always been with another Sanders supporter.
But good on you on not having a horse in the race and still demonstrating confirmation bias.
lol. I provided you are scientific paper studying the election. And it’s just posturing and rhetoric. I’m beginning to think this might just be trolling. If so, well done.
Oh look at all that good hard evidence you are providing. Very convincing. It’s not just “forget your hard evidence. Look at my vague accusations that make me suspicious!”
Do you realize that I’ve had “debates” with Trump supporters that follow virtually the same exact pattern? It’s funny how much my fellow Sanders supporters can sound like Trump supporters.
It’s not just “forget your hard evidence”
very astute
>It’s funny how much my fellow Sanders supporters can sound like Trump supporters.
this is called pigeonholing, and it’s a sort of ad-hominem by association. it’s intellectually dishonest, and doesn’t change the truth of anything i’ve said.
i’m not a sanders supporter. i’m an anarchist.
I apologize. I thought you had said something earlier about supporting Sanders, and when I’ve had this debate before it’s almost always been with another Sanders supporter.
But good on you on not having a horse in the race and still demonstrating confirmation bias.
>But good on you on not having a horse in the race and still demonstrating confirmation bias.
this is just posturing. everything i said is true.
>Do you realize that I’ve had “debates” with Trump supporters that follow virtually the same exact pattern?
i’m not interested in a debate at all.
Pretty standard response after a failed argument.
more posturing and rhetoric
lol. I provided you are scientific paper studying the election. And it’s just posturing and rhetoric. I’m beginning to think this might just be trolling. If so, well done.
> I’m beginning to think this might just be trolling.
your characterization doesn’t change whether everything i’ve said is true.
> I provided you are scientific paper studying the election.
no, you didn’t
>lol
appeal to ridicule