• Dagwood222
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    That’s why it’s done on a case by case basis.

    I’ve know 12 year olds who had opened their own bank accounts and could be trusted to care for a baby, and 16 year olds who needed supervision all day.

    I’m just pointing out how the laws work, I don’t have a stake in the issue.

    • OldWoodFrame
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m not like, blaming you. I’m explaining why it doesn’t make sense to me.

      I don’t think it tracks to allow it on a case by case basis. We have one set of punishment for minor offenders and another for adults. It doesn’t make sense to be allowed to arbitrarily decide after the fact to charge someone with the more serious set of punishments.

      And all of this ignores the fact that juries disproportionately charge black kids as adults, which proves how arbitrary it is in practice.

      • Dagwood222
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s why there are jury trials.

        There’s a difference between the 16 year old who sees that his neighbor left the keys in her car and impulsively takes a spin, and the 35 year old professional thief who stole three cars that week.

          • Dagwood222
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            So, someone who is 17 years and 364 days old is a child, and someone who is 18 years and one day old is a mature adult?

              • Dagwood222
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Like I said previously, that’s why we have trials and discretionary sentencing.