• tsonfeir
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    That’s cool—but it doesn’t actually give any info. What are the environmental risks found in these images?

    This reads like it’s trying to sell something.

    • Shadow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Did you read further down?

      For instance, features like green space and walkable roads were associated with lower risk, while other features, such as poorly paved roads, were associated with higher risk. However, these findings need further investigation.

      Basically they used analysis of street view to figure out what areas are friendly for walking, and compared that to data on health risks for that area.

      Seems like a pretty tenuous link to me though.

      • SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 months ago

        They really need to correct for income, otherwise they’re just finding that poorer areas have worse health outcomes - which is pretty well known.

      • tsonfeir
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes, I read that. It just seemed very vague.