• @summerof69
    link
    42 months ago

    Canonical has nothing to do with Arch Linux, so I don’t see what’s the issue.

    • @tias@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      And I don’t see why Arch is relevant to the discussion. My point is that software being non-proprietary is not a guarantee for preventing fuckery like Microsoft’s. Profit-maximizing companies will maximize their profits, proprietary software or not. Canonical, which sells a non-proprietary Linux distribution, is an example of this.