(water is wet and fire is hot).

  • melpomenesclevage
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    Slightly less obnoxious, but equally ineffective; vote with your hands, your eyes, your feet. Don’t let them steal your labor your attention your time your anything. You can be passive and hold a strike. You van be active and strike back. I think a mix of both would be a lot more effective than just one.

    But whatever you do, if its not just useless theatrical bullshit (which isn’t to say all theatrical bullshit is useless; just the useless kinds) its going to be illegal, and will face state retribution, even if its explicitly legal and protected in your local constitution.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Slightly less obnoxious, but equally ineffective; vote with your hands, your eyes, your feet. Don’t let them steal your labor your attention your time your anything. You can be passive and hold a strike. You van be active and strike back. I think a mix of both would be a lot more effective than just one.

      You can also strike without striking. There’s a huge fuss over “quiet quitting”/“work to rule”, where people are striking by only doing exactly what they’re paid for, rather than adding in the extra that has become the norm. They’re not adding extra hours or pulling extra duties.

      • melpomenesclevage
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        When I say ‘strike back’ the labor actions that come to mind all involve machine guns.