“There’s no incentive to investigate if the president and the White House themselves have announced that aid is unconditional,” said Brian Finucane, who worked for a decade in the Office of the Legal Adviser at the State Department advising on arms transfers and the laws of war.

“That means they don’t want to hear inconvenient legal conclusions,” he told The Independent.

Mr Finucane said senior administration officials he had spoken to had been met with a “shrug” by the US intelligence community when they quizzed them about mass civilian casualty incidents caused by Israeli bombing, “because it’s no one’s job in the US intelligence community, apparently, to actually investigate these things.”

  • Djtecha
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ll also thank you for helping to take away my partners rights (bodily autonomy) by allowing Trump to win. Go be acedemic all you want but we’re going to actually lose a lot if trump wins.

      • Djtecha
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        No, I’ll thank you. You want to use one bad decision to justify another bad decision. And people in this country will suffer for it. And Palestinians will also suffer even more for it. Trump wants to nuke them, so have fun with that choice.

        • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          And people in this country will suffer for it.

          People in this country are already suffering due in no small part to this country’s focus on weapons exports. Are you not aware of that?

          • Djtecha
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Very much so. But the folks that are willing to vote third party just strike me as selfish and those that apparently think they won’t be effected by Trump. Like wtf are yall trying to achieve here? (assuming you just aren’t pushing for trump anyway). You want Biden to lose because he’s sending weapons to an ally. I don’t agree with him doing that but it’s not like the US is going to stop under trump. If anything he’ll double the volume. And in no way is a third party gonna win. So wtf are you aiming for here?

            • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Like wtf are yall trying to achieve here?

              Material influence on the Democrat party and it’s candidates. We’ve been pretty clear about that for decades now.

              • Djtecha
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                By losing them power? There’s other ways to do that. Go work for the campaign of someone that can help push that in the democratic party.

                • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I have.

                  We are told at every turn “we can’t do that because moderate and liberal voters wouldn’t like it”.

                  • Djtecha
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Well you need to get more members of congress in. Cedeing to trump here by boycotting Biden isn’t going to help your end game.