Listening to a recent episode of the Solarpunk Presents podcast reminded me the importance of consistently calling out cryptocurrency as a wasteful scam. The podcast hosts fail to do that, and because bad actors will continue to try to push crypto, we must condemn it with equal persistence.

Solarpunks must be skeptical of anyone saying it’s important to buy something, like a Tesla, or buy in, with cryptocurrency. Capitalists want nothing more than to co-opt radical movements, neutralizing them, to sell products.

People shilling crypto will tell you it decentralizes power. So that’s a lie, but solarpunks who believe it may be fooled into investing in this Ponzi scheme that burns more energy than some countries. Crypto will centralize power in billionaires, increasing their wealth and decreasing their accountability. That’s why Space Karen Elon Musk pushes crypto. The freer the market, the faster it devolves to monopoly. Rather than decentralizing anything, crypto would steer us toward a Bladerunner dystopia with its all-powerful Tyrell corporation.

Promoting crypto on a solarpunk podcast would be unforgivable. That’s not quite what happens on S5E1 “Let’s Talk Tech.” The hosts seem to understand crypto has no part in a solarpunk future or its prefigurative present. But they don’t come out and say that, adopting a tone of impartiality. At best, I would call this disingenuous. And it reeks of the both-sides-ism that corporate media used to paralyze climate action discourse for decades.

Crypto is not “appropriate tech,” and discussing it without any clarity is inappropriate.

Update for episode 5.3: In a case of hyper hypocrisy, they caution against accepting superficial solutions—things that appear utopian but really reinforce inequality and accelerate the climate crisis—while doing exactly that by talking up cryptocurrency.

  • Restaldt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    It only works better on a global scale and only for certain cases. And if you ignore problems present in the current banking system.

    My examples would be:

    people traveling (or refugees fleeing) across multiple countries would benefit from some kind of cryptocurrency in that their assets would be easier to access globally. No having to convert their money as they cross borders or dealing with banks and credit.

    People living in places with unstable government and financial institutions would maybe benefit from having access to a decentralized global system to store some of their money in a system their government doesn’t have a hand in or control over

    Cryptocurrency is still a new technology and idea. Centralized banking has existed for thousands of years.

    Capitalists did what capitalists do and tried to prematurely scam and squeeze as much money out of the idea as possible. Potentially forever ruining the image and possible impact the tech may have had.

    Im pretty salty over what happened with NFTs. There were a lot of exciting things it could have been applied to. But no. It turned into money laundering with ai generated images.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I have yet to hear of a possible use of NFTs that would actually be useful. Stuff that was floated like in-game purchases or concert tickets don’t solve any problems compared to the current system.

      NFTs died out because scamming was the only thing they were useful for.

      • JacobCoffinWrites@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        Aside from all the scams, the other use I’ve seen is corporations trying to use them to create artificial scarcity of digital goods, essentially making NFTs a new flavor of DRM with an added, desperate hope of making DRM and FOMO marketing tactics seem cool, techy, and hip.

        I don’t like DRM, I don’t like artificial scarcity, and the basic premise of NFTs reminds me of those old infomercials where someone promises to sell you the rights to name an actual star, except it’s only in their proprietary database and you have to go to their website to see that anything has changed. I’d rather just have a copy of the digital image itself than a receipt someone gave me claiming that I own it.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          . . . someone promises to sell you the rights to name an actual star, except it’s only in their proprietary database and you have to go to their website to see that anything has changed.

          That’s one of the best descriptions of NFTs I’ve heard, and really brings out its fundamentally scummy nature.

      • bastion@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Art, actually, once the BS has settled.

        Copyrighted works that give owners a small sliver of resale purchases. Buy a used book/audiobook from someone, 2% automatically goes to the author.

        Inventory tracking.

        Fair trade proof of sourcing.

        There are plenty of good uses, and plenty of bad ones.

        Like anything, though, you have to apply effort for change. Crypto isn’t some panacea that solves the world’s problems. It is a tool that will be used for dystopic purposes, and can and will be used for more sound reasons.

      • Glasgow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        They do solve problems though. If there was a simple app that musicians could sell tickets direct to customers, you can loose all the predatory middlemen

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          You don’t need NFTs for that app. You can just make it with a frontend attached to a database and a payment system.

          Venues are contractually tied to TicketMaster and the like. You can’t solve that with NFTs.

          • Glasgow@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            You don’t need it because we have ticketmaster? That’s your argument lol? It’s to prevent the next one.

              • Glasgow@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                They only got those contracts because there was no alternative. Try to infer using your common sense next time. Lots of cities had contracts with taxi companies before uber. And some on chain app will eventually remove the remaining parasitic component.

                • frezik@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  If they went looking for alternatives, it would be another service like TicketMaster. There is no benefit to NFTs here. Try using common sense to think about what NFTs actually solve in this situation. The answer is nothing at all.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      These examples are wishful thinking based on some anecdotes at best.

      Crypto-currencies are a multi-billion dollar business largely run by the worst people from the existing banking and investment sector and people are surprised that it is predominantly used for bad stuff?

      It’s not only an image problem and a few bad apples that spoil the rest, the technology itself is structurally predisposed for these kind scams and acts like a magnet for people with bad intentions, because they know this technology shifts the playing field in their favour.

      Always a recommended read on this topic: https://drewdevault.com/2021/04/26/Cryptocurrency-is-a-disaster.html

      • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        …did you respond to the wrong comment? Cryptocurrency is available from wherever you are - that’s more of a core feature than wishful thinking.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It’s wishful thinking that crypto-currencies have ever been used for those purposes by any significant number of people. Those are anecdotes to whitewash crypto.

          • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            On, yeah, no argument from me there. I thought you meant those things aren’t feasible, not that they aren’t the primary use case.

          • deafboy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            One could argue that narcan has never been used for legitimate purposes by any significant number of people. It’s used primarily by criminals.

            I hope we both agree that it’s a good thing and the criminals should be able to obtain it.

            Denying goods and services to minorities just because a majority has no use for it is simply wrong.

            • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Nice trolling attempt, but being addicted to drugs is not a crime.

        • anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Cryptocurrency is available from wherever you are

          As long as both parties have trusted devices, power and an internet connection.
          With a bank card only one the recipient needs that and with cash nobody does.

    • azertyfun@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      So all you can come up with is some edge cases where traditional banking can’t be relied on? Seems like a very convoluted way of saying that crypto is usually worse than traditional banking.

      Also just wait until you hear that if you can buy crypto, you can probably participate in forex as well. I know people who come from countries you describe, and they just use euros or dollars because a highly volatile currency with astronomical payment processing fees is the opposite of what one needs for daily life, no matter how much what the SV techbros wish it weren’t the case.

        • azertyfun@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Read my message again. The optimization is “use euros or dollars (or yuans or whatever is most applicable regionally)”. Your “optimization” is a solution looking for a problem.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Imagine telling a refugee that jeopardizing their life-savings in a ponzi-scheme is the best they can hope for.