• Rufio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That is likely a benefit but let’s be honest the real reason is that a web version would require a lot of additional overhead especially to staff enough engineers.

    • Supernovae@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      A web wrapper for the platform would be effectively no effort, especially for a company like Facebook. The difficulties would be losing out on tracking data and dealing with annoyances like adblock

      • Rufio
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wouldn’t be surprised if they are working on something now and just wanted to get the app out as an mvp.

    • ShunkW@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This makes no sense honestly. Making a captive web app is easier than supporting two apps.

      • Rufio
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Easier doesn’t mean better though.