• EatATaco
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    You’re confusing deductive reasoning with inductive reasoning. But I wouldn’t even call it inductive reasoning, as it’s really just an empty hypothesis where people are putting what they want to be the truth into the holes of our knowledge…or hell even outright rejecting evidence, like qanons do.

    And, again, Ive already agreed that they don’t 100% believe it. But arguing that they don’t think Boeing had this person killed is just ignoring what they said and assuming what you want.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      This conversation started with some people cheekily blaming Boeing (a fair first reaction). Then some dude chided everyone for being like qanon, I said that was a deep over exaggeration, now here I am getting a lesson in pedantry. What even are conversations like this?

      I read the thread one way and a couple others didn’t. End of story.

      • EatATaco
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        "oh, sorry. I was mistaken about what deductive reasoning means, and I can see why what I said did not convey what I actually think. Thanks for the correction.’

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          “Sorry for caring more about pedantry than the topic at hand. I’ll speak to my therapist about that”

          • EatATaco
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Lol I assure you me and my therapist have way more pressing issues to talk about than you refusing to admit you are wrong.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              The fact that you think a phrase can’t imply a “potential conclusion” and instead must be a “certain conclusion” would agree with you there.

              • EatATaco
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                What didn’t you understand about me and my therapist having more important things to discuss than you being wrong and refusing to admit it?

                Oh, wait, I see what this is. It’s a projection. Your inability to admit you are wrong is something you realize you need to work through, which is why you are claiming that I have issues I need to work through.

                You’ll be fine tho, it’s not that big of a thing.

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  You see you just admitted you got issues beyond “me being wrong”. I used your words against you to say I agree. Surely a pedant could appreciate the weaponization of an opponent’s words to use against them

                  • EatATaco
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    Oh I see, people mean what they say when it confirms what you want to be true, but when it puts you in a tricky spot… Well, then, man you have to be really stupid to think they actually mean it.

                    Lol how convenient

                    Pure gold, my man