• @realitista
    link
    228 days ago

    Then we can totally agree. It’s not what Germany did though.

    • @itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      528 days ago

      Yes, but it’s too late to reverse that course. Germany’s nuclear plants are out of operation, and refitting and restarting them would take many years (most of them were at their end of life when they were shut down), and involve costs better spend towards the long term by building up renewables directly, and shutting down coal.

        • @zaphod@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          127 days ago

          No, it’s going down. There was a sharp decline in 2019, in 2020 it was even lower due to the pandemic and then went up again to the level of around 2019. 2022 was a little worse because of lower gas consumption due to the war in Ukraine, gas was partially replaced with coal. The last nuclear power plants were shut down in April 2023, yet 2023 also saw lower coal consumption than even in 2020, which strongly suggests that nuclear isn’t replaced by coal.

          • @realitista
            link
            127 days ago

            Honestly even gas should be phased out before nuclear.

            • @zaphod@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              127 days ago

              Well, if we look at nuclear and gas we can also see that nuclear wasn’t replaced by gas in Germany. Gas and nuclear have very different purposes in the grid, on can be spun up almost on demand the other can’t. Anyway, at least in Germany there is no nuclear power anymore so arguing that something else should be phased out first is pointless, and saying that nuclear was replaced by coal or gas is spreading fakenews.

              • @realitista
                link
                127 days ago

                Every nuclear plant that is closed is a coal or gas plant that could be closed, so yes, coal is replacing it.