• @dinckelman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3526 days ago

      Because being received well isn’t what Microsoft are after. They’re after making as much money, as (un-)realistically possible, even if it means shutting down things. This isn’t the first, and definitely not the last time. They’ve had more than a handful of studios with iconic IPs, that got absolutely annihilated after acquisition

      • @ampersandrew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2426 days ago

        Being after well received titles is congruent with their Game Pass strategy. Being after as much money as possible would mean they probably should have charged more than $30 for one of the best games of the year.

    • @GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2126 days ago

      Ten years to make one well received game. After two failed high budget titles, an attempt at a franchise, Ghostwire and a mobile game supported for only five months.

      The studio head Shinji Mikami left shortly after Hi-Fi rush. So I would guess any projects they had in the works weren’t interesting enough to justify the costs.

    • @xkforce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      226 days ago

      Just because the company you work for is making bank doesn’t mean they won’t fire you at the drop of a hat if they think they can make more by doing it.

    • Captain Poofter
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -526 days ago

      Tbh, the game wasn’t even that good. After the first 5-6 hours most people put it down. It just becomes frustrating and not fun.