The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 2 months agoHail, Caesar [Scott Hilburn]lemmy.worldimagemessage-square63fedilinkarrow-up1991arrow-down117file-text
arrow-up1974arrow-down1imageHail, Caesar [Scott Hilburn]lemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square63fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareKusimulkkulinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months ago Well, if its ok/works for ProPublica, then that’s enough for me. That’s a big “if” on if it works. So wouldn’t go around saying it works. Just that someone else is doing it too.
minus-squareCosmic Cleric@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months ago Well, if its ok/works for ProPublica, then that’s enough for me. That’s a big “if” on if it works. So wouldn’t go around saying it works. Just that someone else is doing it too. Oh I’m using English properly, in the way I phrased it. And if they, and their lawyers, believe it works, that’s good enough for me. Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
minus-squareKusimulkkulinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agoDid their lawyers really advice them to put it there believing it works?
minus-squareCosmic Cleric@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-22 months ago Did their lawyers really advice them to put it there believing it works? I wasn’t in the room with them, but IMO it would be malpractice of the lawyers if they didn’t, so I’m going to assume yes, they did. It definitely empowers them to go after anyone who uses their content outside of the license. And it doesn’t hurt to have it there. There’s nothing wrong with protecting your rights, ever. Finally, let’s not derail the OP post any more than already has been done. If you wish to continue the discussion, it should be done over here… https://lemmy.world/comment/9850401 Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
minus-squareCosmic Cleric@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-22 months ago But you know they advised it? Are you expecting me to have been in the room with them when they discussed it? I wasn’t in the room with them Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
minus-squareKusimulkkulinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agoI don’t know how you’d know. That’s why I’m asking.
![Hail, Caesar [Scott Hilburn]](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/6cdf0ce8-4dda-47a8-8244-c49eeb1e6e84.jpeg){kind=link}
That’s a big “if” on if it works. So wouldn’t go around saying it works. Just that someone else is doing it too.
Oh I’m using English properly, in the way I phrased it.
And if they, and their lawyers, believe it works, that’s good enough for me.
Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
Did their lawyers really advice them to put it there believing it works?
I wasn’t in the room with them, but IMO it would be malpractice of the lawyers if they didn’t, so I’m going to assume yes, they did.
It definitely empowers them to go after anyone who uses their content outside of the license.
And it doesn’t hurt to have it there. There’s nothing wrong with protecting your rights, ever.
Finally, let’s not derail the OP post any more than already has been done. If you wish to continue the discussion, it should be done over here…
https://lemmy.world/comment/9850401
Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
But you know they advised it?
Are you expecting me to have been in the room with them when they discussed it?
Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
I don’t know how you’d know. That’s why I’m asking.