• Thorny_Insight
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yeah it’s not a slur just like the words male and female aren’t either but they can be used with the intention to insult when directed at people not identifying as such.

    I don’t agree with labeling the term as such but I do agree with the core intention which is to prevent harrasment. I don’t quite see what the issue is here. This will not cause trouble to anyone using the term appropriately.

    • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      How does the statement “the words ‘cis’ or ‘cisgendered’ are considered slurs on this platform” leave any room for appropriate use of those terms.

    • Omgarm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      But it will cause trouble, because it is now (treated as) a slur on Twitter. Depending on how strict they are you can’t go around saying “as a cisgender” or having it in your bio.

      • Thorny_Insight
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        TechCrunch reported on Tuesday that trying to publish a post using the terms “cisgender” or “cis” in the X mobile app will pop up a full-screen warning reading, “This post contains language that may be considered a slur by X and could be used in a harmful manner in violation of our rules.” It then gives you the choice of continuing to publish the post…

        Like I said earlier: context matters