• Thorny_Insight
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    27 days ago

    Yeah, “just shove it in deeper” sounds like a brilliant plan.

    Does your past experience in brain surgery suggest that this might be a bad idea?

    They’re volunteers with next to nothing to lose. This isn’t some healthy person who just wants to play angry birds with their mind. They’re getting an experimental device planted into their brain. I’m sure they’re aware of the risks.

        • Technus@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          If this was something they knew could happen, why didn’t they prepare the patient so he’d know what to expect? Informing the patient of what can go wrong is an important step in even routine surgery, let alone experimentation.

          Moreover, it would have blunted this exact criticism if they were simply to say, “yes, this is something we expected from our trials but we specifically chose this depth to start with for these reasons”.

          The actual blog post only mentions the thread retraction in passing: https://neuralink.com/blog/prime-study-progress-update-user-experience/

    • modeler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      26 days ago

      There is non-zero risk in every surgery, and this is a major surgery. There is non-zero risk of very very severe consequences: brain infection, stroke being just some. While these risks are low, they are non-zero. The volunteers have the possibility of losing everything.

      • Thorny_Insight
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        26 days ago

        And I’m sure they’re aware of that. What are you trying to say here? Abandon development of this technology?

        • cestvrai
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          26 days ago

          Or focus on the non-invasive form of this technology.

          • Thorny_Insight
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            26 days ago

            I don’t think it’s capable of doing what the ultimate goal of Neuralink is, which is much more than being able to move a cursor on the screen. Science and technology wont stop advancing just because it’s potenttially risky.