• bellsDoSing
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    Your last paragraph seems misinformed.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gymnasium_(Germany)

    State-funded schools (a big majority) are tuition-free, as foreseen by the respective laws, even often on constitutional level. Segregation of students by parent wealth or income is looked down upon, to the point of being an exception to the constitutionally guaranteed freedom to have private schools (Article 7 section 4 of the German constitution, Sondierungsverbot). Of the private gymnasia, the vast majority is run by the Catholic Church on very low tuition fees (which is more easy as by Concordat, the Church receives a high percentage of the amount of money the State need not spend for a pupil in a Church-school); fees for schools who need to earn money by teaching are higher. Schools with fees generally offer scholarships.

    In 2005, the German government spent €5,400 per student for those attending public gymnasium. This is less than what was spent on a student attending Hauptschule, but more than was spent on those attending Realschule.[22] Some Hauptschule and Gesamtschule students have special needs requiring extra help, so those schools cannot operate as cost-effectively as gymnasia.

    I myself went to a public Gymnasium and can still remember that among my classmates we had a wide range re “parent income and status”.

    Literally from:

    • ‘single parent that barely gets by’
    • ‘teacher parents’
    • attorneys / judges / cardiologist / engineers / etc.
    • CEO parent of an international company

    I literally:

    • went through elementary school
    • got a recommendation for going to a Gymnasium at end of 4th year based on my performance
    • picked one out of the available Gymnasiums in my area (within what was doable by bus on a daily basis)
    • then went there

    And even if you go to “Hauptschule”, that’s not the end of education. One can still do what’s called “M-Zweig”, which gets you the equivalent degree of “Realschule”. Then one can go to “FOS”, which gets you a degree close to that of Gymnasium. It at least allows for going to a “university of applied sciences”, which is less geared towards academics and more towards industry. Still can get you your masters degree or if a doctors degree if one really wants that and partners with an “academic university” (AFAIR).

    Some children simply take that other route. Still, it comes down to ability of the child. Of course, having a non-supportive environment that doesn’t believe in achild can make things harder on it. Some children might actually be motivated by “potentially escaping that”.

    But to say this education system is a “class filter” is just wrong.

      • bellsDoSing
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        Maybe I have bit too positive outlook on this, yeah.

        But that article also emphasizes a lot (first half) that a child’s environment simply matters a lot. Esp. having parents that have higher education themselves and are there for the child to support it regarding learning outside of school can make a big difference. And this isn’t just about the first couple years before elementary school (what article says re “Wortschatz”). Esp. the ongoing school period thereafter. E.g. “Does it make a difference in a child’s household if parents can speak English when trying to learn English?” - of course it does!

        The point on “Brennpunktschulen” is also very environment driven. I’m not saying that “Lehrermangel” isn’t real, or that having this system of three school paths starting from 5th grade is the best invention ever.

        But one can’t put all the blame on the school system, when “what happens outside of school” has such a big impact on a child.

          • bellsDoSing
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            25 days ago

            TBH, I don’t know much about school systems of other countries. Just reading horror stories of the US education system re student loans at times. So can’t really argue that point with you.

            But I’m not sure what made you think I’m blaming the children. Not once did I make a remark that would suggest that.

            So let me be clear: Children, while they are still considered children, really can’t be blamed. As they become adolescents, then slowly, but ever increasingly more, their own viewpoints and actions will have an impact on how their education is going (esp. true if a child goes a lot further in education than their parents ever did).

            Rather there’s some blame to be put on the social environment and the child’s parents. E.g. it’s not the fault of the education system if child’s parents are divorcing while the kid is in Kindergarden and the child then has to switch schools multiple times, not because the child is problematic or because the education system is pushing the child around. No, chances are most of the blame is on the parents then.