• EatATaco
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    24 days ago

    Headline is misleading. The article notes that they arent necessarily withholding them permanently, but because they are going through the disciplinary process, and so currently not in good standing, they can’t get them at graduation.

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      24 days ago

      Similar to Israel telling Palestinians that they can’t have a state “right now” and have to come to “agreeable” terms first.

      If there is no term given it means permanently.

      • EatATaco
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        But they did “give the terms”: they are not in good standing right now, and when the disciplinary action is complete then a final decision will be made.

          • EatATaco
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            24 days ago

            It might be technically correct because bar does not necessarily mean permanently, but it implies that, and your claim that it means permanent is definitely false, especially if you’re basing it on the logic you used to claim it’s permanent.

              • EatATaco
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                24 days ago

                Technically are permanently barred unless overturned.

                The articles notes that they are not in good standing because they are in the process of disciplinary action. So considering this is not a ruling against them that needs to be overturned. If you have some kind of evidence otherwise, I would like to see it.