Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx has stirred debate since proposing that her office no longer file felony charges when the cases stem solely from minor traffic violations.

Foxx says her intent is to reduce the incentive for police to conduct “pretextual stops,” where an officer uses a minor violation to pull over a car in order to find probable cause for another crime. Data shows such stops disproportionately target people of color and rarely result in charges.

Other jurisdictions have implemented similar policies over the last several years and report some success, not only in reducing such stops but rebuilding trust.

“It was indeed the most controversial thing that I had done,” said John Choi, the top prosecutor of Ramsey County, which covers St. Paul, Minnesota.

Two years ago, Choi stepped before a microphone and promised “a better version of public safety and justice” in announcing his office would enact a policy very similar to what Foxx is proposing.

Choi said he used to believe such stops were beneficial for police investigations but said he couldn’t ignore that less than 2% resulted in charges and that Black drivers were being stopped at four times the rate of other drivers in St. Paul.

“For the longest time, we’ve been policing in a way that is going after that 2% but not recognizing the harm that has been done to communities,” he said when he announced the policy.

Choi said he believes the decision has been a resounding success, citing an independent study that showed a drastic reduction in stops for minor violations, particularly among Black drivers.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240605123622/https://chicago.suntimes.com/police-reform/2024/06/04/kim-foxx-not-charge-traffic-stops-success

  • catloaf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m confused. Felonies are generally more serious crimes. If a felony is being committed, does it matter how it was noticed?

    But it also says that less than 2% of stops resulted in a felony charge. That still seems like a lot of felonies. And 96% of stops resulted in nothing? That seems incredibly high.

    It feels like a lot of factors are being muddled together here, painting a very unclear picture. Or maybe it’s just that I haven’t finished my coffee yet.

    • mosiacmango
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      over 4x as many people of color are pulled over as non POC during these stops

      This is the important part. Cops are racist. They will stop 80 POC, 20 non POC, and arrest 2 of them for felonies. This puts targeted, inordinate strain on POC communities, who are consistently harassed by racist cops, which is an unjust act much worse than the felonies. Remeber felonies can be as non harmful as “has too much weed,” etc.

      If cops weren’t racist, it wouldn’t be an issue, but they continue to be racist at every oppurtunity, so this prosecutor is trying to stop that racism by making it fruitless.

      • Vespair
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I agree, but this feels like just doing something tangential rather than addressing the issue. Until we clear out, clear up, and rebuild police departments from the ground up, they are going to continue to be motivated by racism and minority citizens will continue to be unfairly target and charged.

        I’m not saying this isn’t a good thing or that it won’t help, but it feels like trying to put a single bandaid on somebody bleeding out after a bear mauling.

        That said, we all only have the power of our station and our voice, so I do appreciate this prosecutor trying to do what they can with the power they has, and I do think they should be celebrated for it.