• Evil_Shrubbery
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    260
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 days ago

    It is adequate.
    It performs it’s function.

    No need for extreme consumerism & garbage production.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      151
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      It’s biodegradable, renewable, and only needs to get from the manufacturer to your cabinet, where it can be replaced with heartier permanent storage.

      • errer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        Real environmentalists just pack the flour into their jeans pockets to avoid unnecessary paper waste

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 days ago

        Same for sugar, it’s really annoying that so many things have switched to plastic. Gram crackers, Ritz and Saltines all used to be in waxed paper when I was a kid and were fine.

        Now they switch to plastic, but make sure it’s tinted to mimic the old paper versions.

      • moody@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        17 days ago

        And it also needs to leave everything inside my backpack coated in a thin layer of flour.

        What I don’t get is why they put it in a single two-layer paper bag instead of two single-layer paper bags, which would clearly be more effective.

      • thesystemisdown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        There might be a desire from those that were looking for the top response to let it ride for visibility. I wish most things were as practically packaged as flour.

        Edit: Can we do coffee next? I drink a lot of the stuff, and unless I roast my own, there is absolutely no environmentally friendly option. I tried roasting my own. I set off the smoke detector, upset the dogs, and made my house smell bad.

        • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          17 days ago

          Most of the local roasters I go to sell coffee in recyclable paper bags that are technically resealable using the little bendy tie thingy. I end up just dumping it into an airtight glass jar once I open it up though.

          • Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            17 days ago

            Mine are always using plastic. I guess because they can seal it better? I feel like if I’m buying it directly to have it fresh this really doesn’t do shit, so I would be very cool with paper bags too.

        • BubbleMonkey@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          Do you consider carbon neutral/negative(or at least as close as possible) to be environmentally friendly? What about sustainable agricultural practices?

          If yes, I bought some coffee from Tiny Footprint coffee, which claims to be carbon negative, allegedly gets coffee from smaller local growers (you can pick the growing conditions you like, so like I got a bunch from women-owned farms), and they are actively trying to restore the areas where they source coffee. Also it’s packed in wax coated paper, and I believe you can buy bulk if you like.

          It’s not cheap, and the roasts tend lighter than you’d expect (so imo a medium brews like a light), but it’s really good coffee.

          And yeah, I live kinda close to a coffee roaster and it doesn’t smell great at all. If you have a garage, a cheap used oven set up out there might do the trick.

          • thesystemisdown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 days ago

            Sweet, thanks!

            Yes, I seek out the most ethical option with whatever I consume. Being fair to people and kind to the environment should always come before convenience and profit. Especially for anything considered a luxury like coffee or chocolate. It would be nice if it was just on the shelf at the store since I’m already there, but it usually doesn’t work that way.

      • atomicorange@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Downvoting isn’t for disagreement. If you think the conversation is valuable you can upvote for visibility while disagreeing in a comment. This is important subject matter that needs to be hashed out!

      • TheTetrapod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        17 days ago

        I think it’s because a lot of people’s (myself included) knee-jerk reaction is “yeah, those bags do suck”, then they look at the comments and either realize the tide is against them or end up agreeing with the points in the comments upon reflection.